Peer review

DOUBLE-BLIND PEER REVIEW

Editorial Unión Científica implements a double-blind peer review system, where reviewers are not affiliated with Editorial Unión Científica nor part of the editorial team. This ensures the quality, impartiality, and scientific rigor of all our publications. This method guarantees that both reviewers and authors remain anonymous during the evaluation process, minimizing potential biases and promoting objective analysis of the content.

STAGES OF THE EDITORIAL PROCESS

  1. Reception of the manuscript: The manuscript is received and preliminarily evaluated by the editorial team to verify compliance with the editorial guidelines and alignment with the publication's themes and objectives.
  2. Assignment of reviewers: Once the initial evaluation is passed, the manuscript is sent to expert reviewers in the relevant thematic area. These reviewers are selected for their expertise and knowledge of the subject matter, ensuring qualified assessments.
  3. Anonymous evaluation: The reviewers analyze the manuscript considering criteria such as originality, relevance, methodology, coherence, results, and contributions to the field of study. During this process, the names of both authors and reviewers remain concealed to ensure neutral evaluations.
  4. Review report: Reviewers issue a detailed report that includes comments, observations, and recommendations:
    • Acceptance: If the manuscript meets all required standards.
    • Minor or major revisions: If corrections or significant improvements are needed by the authors.
    • Rejection: If the manuscript does not meet the established academic or quality standards.
  5. Editorial decision: The editorial committee, based on the reviewers reports, makes the final decision regarding the publication of the manuscript. If corrections are requested, authors must submit the revised version for re-evaluation.
  6. Follow-up and communication: Throughout the process, authors are promptly informed about the status of their manuscript.

RECOGNITION OF REVIEWERS

At Editorial Unión Científica, we value the work of our reviewers, whose contributions enhance the quality and scientific rigor of our publications. Therefore, we offer several forms of recognition:

  • Certificate of recognition: Reviewers receive an official certificate acknowledging their participation in the peer review process, highlighting their contribution to academic development.
  • Public acknowledgment: With the reviewer’s consent, their name may be included in an acknowledgment list published annually on the editorial website, as part of our transparency and gratitude policy.
  • Publication discounts: Reviewers may receive discounts on the publication fees for their own manuscripts once they have passed the review phase.

Contributing as a reviewer is a recognized merit in the academic field, strengthening professional profiles and fostering connections with the scientific community.