Smart hybrid models for personalized learning in higher education

Authors

Elizabeth Alexandra Veloz Segura
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Sociales, Filosóficas y Humanísticas. Universidad Estatal de Bolívar. Guaranda, Ecuador. ROR: https://ror.org/005cgg117
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4562-7619
Verónica Teresa Veloz Segura
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Sociales, Filosóficas y Humanísticas. Universidad Estatal de Bolívar. Guaranda, Ecuador. ROR: https://ror.org/005cgg117
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1440-0115
Javier Alonso Veloz Segura
Facultad de Jurisprudencia, Ciencias Sociales y Políticas. Universidad Estatal de Bolívar. Guaranda, Ecuador. ROR: https://ror.org/005cgg117
https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0396-2487
Washington Raúl Fierro Saltos
Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, Sociales, Filosóficas y Humanísticas. Universidad Estatal de Bolívar. Guaranda, Ecuador. ROR: https://ror.org/005cgg117
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-4701

Keywords:

personalized learning, higher education, intelligent hybrid models, learning pathways, early warning systems

Synopsis

This research addresses the need to manage student diversity and academic trajectories in higher education through personalized learning, overcoming the risks of algorithmic reductionism and decontextualized automation that depersonalize the educational process. Through an applied instructional design approach and a systematic review of the technical literature, this study proposes and substantiates the architecture of an intelligent hybrid model that coherently articulates and integrates massive analytical data sources from learning management systems (LMS), educational ontologies, explicit pedagogical rules, and machine learning algorithms. The conceptual results demonstrate that the development and implementation of adaptive environments and intelligent tutors make it possible to model dynamic student profiles and structure flexible learning paths that continuously adjust according to students’ achievement levels. In this context, we successfully designed highly efficient early-warning systems based on data mining that promptly identify signs of academic risk and vulnerability, thereby significantly reducing dropout rates and enhancing student retention. It is concluded that the true effectiveness of intelligent hybrid models is not limited to their metric or predictive accuracy, but rather lies substantially in active faculty mediation, algorithmic transparency, decision explainability, and ethical and institutional governance of information. Technological personalization gains viability and social value only when it is established as a tool aimed at strengthening equity, inclusion, and informed human decision-making within the university ecosystem.

Core

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Du Plooy, D. Casteleijn, y D. Franzsen, “Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement”, Heliyon, vol. 10, núm. 21, p. e39630, nov. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630.

J. Ning, Z. Ma, J. Yao, Q. Wang, y B. Zhang, “Personalized learning supported by learning analytics: a systematic review of functions, pathways, and educational outcomes”, Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 33, núm. 8, pp. 5042–5064, sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2478437.

C. D. Kloos et al., “H2O Learn - Hybrid and Human-Oriented Learning: Trustworthy and Human-Centered Learning Analytics (TaHCLA) for Hybrid Education”, en 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Tunis, Tunisia: IEEE, mar. 2022, pp. 94–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766770.

B. A. Chaushi, B. Selimi, A. Chaushi, y M. Apostolova, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Comprehensive Review”, en Explainable Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1902, L. Longo, Ed., en Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 1902. , Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 48–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44067-0_3.

I. Yuyun y D. Suherdi, “Components and Strategies for Personalized Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review”, en Proceedings of the 20th AsiaTEFL-68th TEFLIN-5th iNELTAL Conference (ASIATEFL 2022), vol. 749, U. Widiati, M. Hidayati, N. Suryati, Suharyadi, A. N. Wulyani, I. L. Damayanti, N. A. Drajati, S. Karmina, E. L. Zen, L. Hakim, y Prihantoro, Eds., en Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, vol. 749. , Paris: Atlantis Press SARL, 2023, pp. 271–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-054-1_23.

M. A. Chatti y A. Muslim, “The PERLA Framework: Blending Personalization and Learning Analytics”, Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn., vol. 20, núm. 1, feb. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3936.

W. Villegas-Ch y J. García-Ortiz, “Enhancing Learning Personalization in Educational Environments through Ontology-Based Knowledge Representation”, Computers, vol. 12, núm. 10, p. 199, oct. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12100199.

O. Zawacki-Richter, V. I. Marín, M. Bond, y F. Gouverneur, “Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators?”, Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 16, núm. 1, p. 39, dic. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0.

C. Guzmán-Valenzuela, C. Gómez-González, A. Rojas-Murphy Tagle, y A. Lorca-Vyhmeister, “Learning analytics in higher education: a preponderance of analytics but very little learning?”, Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 18, núm. 1, p. 23, dic. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00258-x.

M. Blumenstein, “Synergies of Learning Analytics and Learning Design: A Systematic Review of Student Outcomes”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 7, núm. 3, pp. 13–32, dic. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2020.73.3.

J. Liang et al., “Student Modeling and Analysis in Adaptive Instructional Systems”, IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 59359–59372, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3178744.

S. Lonn y B. Koester, “Rearchitecting Data for Researchers: A Collaborative Model for Enabling Institutional Learning Analytics in Higher Education”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 6, núm. 2, jul. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.8.

J. Peng y Y. Li, “Frontiers of Artificial Intelligence for Personalized Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Leading Articles”, Appl. Sci., vol. 15, núm. 18, p. 10096, sep. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810096.

H. Khosravi, K. Kitto, y J. J. Williams, “RiPPLE: A Crowdsourced Adaptive Platform for Recommendation of Learning Activities”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 6, núm. 3, dic. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.63.12.

R. J. Waddington, S. Nam, S. Lonn, y S. D. Teasley, “Improving Early Warning Systems with Categorized Course Resource Usage”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 3, núm. 3, pp. 263–290, dic. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.13.

G. Ramaswami, T. Susnjak, y A. Mathrani, “Effectiveness of a Learning Analytics Dashboard for Increasing Student Engagement Levels”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 10, núm. 3, pp. 115–134, dic. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7935.

K. Bayly-Castaneda, M.-S. Ramirez-Montoya, y A. Morita-Alexander, “Crafting personalized learning paths with AI for lifelong learning: a systematic literature review”, Front. Educ., vol. 9, p. 1424386, ago. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1424386.

R. Hidalgo y G. Evans, “Analytics for Action: Assessing effectiveness and impact of data informed interventions on online modules”, RIED Rev. Iberoam. Educ. Distancia, vol. 23, núm. 2, p. 103, jul. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.23.2.26450.

D. Ifenthaler, D. Gibson, y E. Dobozy, “The synergistic and dynamic relationship between learning design and learning analytics”, ASCILITE Publ., pp. 112–116, nov. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2017.752.

E. T. Khor y M. K, “A Systematic Review of the Role of Learning Analytics in Supporting Personalized Learning”, Educ. Sci., vol. 14, núm. 1, p. 51, dic. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010051.

F. Jin, B. Maheshi, R. Martinez-Maldonado, D. Gašević, y Y.-S. Tsai, “Scaffolding Feedback Literacy: Designing a Feedback Analytics Tool with Students”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 11, núm. 2, pp. 123–137, jul. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8339.

D. Ifenthaler y J. Y.-K. Yau, “Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review”, Educ. Technol. Res. Dev., vol. 68, núm. 4, pp. 1961–1990, ago. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09788-z.

Z. Pan, L. Biegley, A. Taylor, y H. Zheng, “A Systematic Review of Learning Analytics: Incorporated Instructional Interventions on Learning Management Systems”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 11, núm. 2, pp. 52–72, may 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.8093.

N. Bergdahl, M. Bond, J. Sjöberg, M. Dougherty, y E. Oxley, “Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review”, Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, núm. 1, p. 63, dic. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y.

A. N. Cormack, “A Data Protection Framework for Learning Analytics”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 3, núm. 1, abr. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.6.

I. Rets, C. Herodotou, y A. Gillespie, “Six Practical Recommendations Enabling Ethical Use of Predictive Learning Analytics in Distance Education”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 10, núm. 1, pp. 149–167, feb. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2023.7743.

J. Weidlich, D. Gašević, y H. Drachsler, “Causal Inference and Bias in Learning Analytics: A Primer on Pitfalls Using Directed Acyclic Graphs”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 9, núm. 3, pp. 183–199, dic. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2022.7577.

N. Elouazizi, “Critical Factors In Data Governance For Learning Analytics”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 1, núm. 3, pp. 211–222, ago. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2014.13.25.

N. Sclater, “Developing a Code of Practice for Learning Analytics”, J. Learn. Anal., vol. 3, núm. 1, abr. 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.3.

Y.-S. Tsai y D. Gasevic, “Learning analytics in higher education --- challenges and policies: a review of eight learning analytics policies”, en Proceedings of the Seventh International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, Vancouver British Columbia Canada: ACM, mar. 2017, pp. 233–242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027400.

Cover

Downloads

Published

June 25, 2026

Categories

Details about this monograph

ISBN-13 (15)

978-9907-9552-2-4

How to Cite

Smart hybrid models for personalized learning in higher education. (2026). Editorial Unión Científica. https://doi.org/10.63804/libroseuc.5